Set Pieces: The Importance of Strategy in Modern Football

DON'T MISS OUR LIVE EVENTS

JOIN OUR WEBINARS & WORKSHOPS AND LEARN FROM TOP COACHES

Set Pieces

Unlike other sports such as athletics, swimming or even basketball or volleyball, football is a very complex sport, in which it is extremely difficult to find repeating situations where players can identify and take advantage of rapid patterns of closed action. Yet, coaches today are giving more importance to set pieces. In professional clubs and teams, it is becoming more common for a staff member to have responsibility over set pieces in training and in games.

In relation to this topic, we would like to give raise to certain questions and point out some ideas for a discussion between coaches.

1. What are the differences between tactical training and strategy?

We tend to talk about set pieces as situations where the game restarts (after a foul, corner kick or a throw-in). These situations have in common that the team who has the possession of the ball without having the need to dispute it will decide the timing of the ball being put into play. This allows players of this team to follow a common and known training pattern. This is what we normally understand as strategy [1] and it differs from tactical situations because it is precisely the collective following of a guideline to solve an identified problem.

At this point we like to think that the line that separates tactics from strategy should not be marked by the fact that we find ourselves in situations of restarting the game, but because the players identify the predetermined and trained contexts the which could be utilized as closed patterns. For example, one of our players has the ball in the opponent’s half and in one of the wings, cannot cross, but can chose between passing the ball to a defender or a central midfielder. From this moment forward, all the players have designated movements that are specific in the coordination of an action between the team. This would allow the combination of tactical and strategic training.

“THE LINE THAT SEPARATES TACTICS FROM STRATEGY SHOULD NOT BE MARKED BY THE FACT THAT WE FIND OURSELVES IN SITUATIONS OF RESTARTING THE GAME, BUT BECAUSE THE PLAYERS IDENTIFY THE PREDETERMINED AND TRAINED CONTEXTS WHICH COULD BE UTILIZED AS CLOSED PATTERNS”

2. What importance should we give to our training plans to strategy training?

Plenty, taking into consideration that following closed guidelines gives a lot of advantage to increase the efficiency of our competition units (it allows us to know what to do, what will our opponent do, etc). Additionally, many of the set pieces situations occur in the boxes or allow attack or defending in these areas, which makes them heavily related to goal-scoring situations. And even more so, as we stated in the previous section, we should consider the strategic situations in a much broader way and not limited to the situations of restarting the game.

3. At what age should we start to train these types of situations?

Traditionally, it has been said that these types of situations must be trained from the performance stages, but in our opinion, we should train (as we do with other type of problems) adjusting ourselves to the abilities of the individuals. It is true that until the players do not dominate from a tactical perspective, the fundamentals (passing, controlling, supporting, losing the mark, etc) or until they have the enough strength to cross, make long passes or finish off with a header, we should not ask them to follow instructions that include these elements.

In other words, there are aspects of strategic behaviours that we should not train until the final stage of technification or the beginning of the performance stage. But there are other aspects of the strategic behaviour that we can train from a much younger age, such as collective pattern of taking advantage of rapid free kicks or throw-ins. Precisely, throw-ins (one of the moments in which possession of the ball is lost most often in youth categories) could be a good introduction at these ages of strategic training.

In relation to set piece training, here we have not tried to resolve the questions that were initially raised, but to give some ideas or arguments for the discussion between coaches. In reality, there would be other questions in relation to this topic that could also serve to contrast opinions, for example: Is the training of attacking and defending set pieces equally important? How flexible or inflexible should the action guidelines of the strategic situation be that we train?

[1] Riera, J. (2001). Sport abilities, human abilities. Apunts EF, 64, 46-53.

Title

Go to Top