Introduction

In modern football, tactical systems are not fixed structures that remain constant throughout a match or across a competition. It is crucial to understand the opponent’s structure and adapt your own to maximize your strengths and exploit their weaknesses. In this article, we will analyze the 4-3-3 formation and explore possible modifications to optimize performance when facing two other popular formations: 4-2-3-1 and 3-5-2.

The 4-3-3 system emphasizes player connections, providing each player with numerous passing options. The spaces of each player are linked to those of their teammates. To facilitate these connections, the system organizes players rationally across the field, ensuring optimal depth and width — two key elements that enhance ball circulation. Let’s delve into more details!

Advantages & Disadvantages of 4-3-3

The 4-3-3 system offers several key advantages. First, it ensures a rational occupation of space, allowing players to position themselves efficiently on the field. Additionally, with three players in central positions and the ability to create width and depth through the wingers, this formation provides various tactical options involving the attacking midfielders, strikers, and fullbacks. Furthermore, the 4-3-3 enables teams to close down the opponent’s game on the flanks by creating numerical superiority, while also making high pressing more effective compared to the 4-4-2 formation.

The 4-3-3 system, like any other formation, has its general disadvantages. One notable drawback is the use of only one striker, which can limit attacking options. Additionally, the formation can create defensive vulnerabilities, particularly in the spaces next to the holding midfielder. It also requires highly specific player profiles for certain positions. For instance, the holding midfielder needs excellent balance, as well as strong passing, perception, and anticipation skills, while the wingers must be proficient in 1v1 situations, attacking space, and delivering accurate crosses.

Now, let’s explore some strategies for using the 4-3-3 formation against other systems.

4-3-3 vs 3-5-2

When facing a 3-5-2 system, the positioning of fullbacks and midfielders becomes crucial. Fullbacks moving closer to the center backs can create multiple playmaking options — such as diagonal passes to the wingers, passes inside to an advanced midfielder, or passes back to the center back — which are key for breaking down tight defenses. A critical aspect of overcoming the 3-5-2 is recognizing pressing triggers, whether it is a midfielder or a wingback leading the press.

If a midfielder presses our fullback, we can create numerical advantages in central areas, especially if an opposing center-back hesitates to press aggressively. If the center-back does press, leaving space behind, we should encourage our advanced midfielder to attack this space, taking advantage of moments of confusion within the opponent’s defense.

Conversely, if a wingback presses our fullback, one of their center-backs will usually shift to cover the flank. In this scenario, it is advantageous to attack the space behind that center-back with our winger, as center-backs are typically less effective when defending from wide positions. Our wingers, often faster and more skilled in creating space, can exploit this mismatch effectively.

In a positional attack against a 3-5-2 formation, changing the structure involves several key concepts. First, in the dynamic zone, it is essential to anticipate how the opponent will adjust their press against our fullbacks. Second, locating the holding midfielder becomes crucial, as they play a key role in either advancing play through the middle or switching the orientation of the game. Lastly, altering the internal structure by adding an additional player can create confusion for the opposing center-backs, opening up opportunities to exploit their uncertainty. For example, our striker can shift to a false 9 role.

4-3-3 vs 4-2-3-1

In a positional attack with the 4-3-3 system against a 4-2-3-1 formation, two key concepts stand out. First, the 4-3-3 provides a numerical advantage in the build-up phase, with two center-backs versus one striker, allowing for better ball circulation and control. Second, it is important to capitalize on the positional advantage of our two advanced midfielders who operate behind the opponent’s midfield line, creating space for players to exploit and advance the attack.

When facing a 4-2-3-1 formation, the 4-3-3’s flexibility provides better control of space, particularly during the build-up phase, and can provoke aggressive pressure from the opponent. If your fullback is pressed by the opposing winger, using the concept of beating the cover shadow with one of the advanced midfielder — a team fundamental that Girona FC has mastered and incorporated into their tactical approach. This strategy involves creating space by moving the fullback closer to the center-backs, while the attacking midfielder makes a long run into the dynamic zone to receive the ball. Meanwhile, the winger should pin the opposing fullback, and if timed correctly, this movement can generate significant advantages for progressing the attack.

As mentioned earlier, we have a numerical advantage in the build-up phase with two center-backs versus one striker. We need to use this advantage to find a center-back with enough time to drive the ball forward. By doing so, we can exploit the movements of our advanced midfielders, giving the center-back two key passing options to help the team progress.

The first option is a straightforward pass to the nearest advanced midfielder, who will push into open areas, drawing the opponent’s midfield and creating new passing options. If there is no clear pass inside the block and the passing lane is closed, the center-back can opt for a long diagonal pass to the opposite advanced midfielder to attack the space or switch play with a long pass to the winger on the opposite flank.

Finally, when playing against a 3-5-2 formation, another solution is to create numerical superiority at the base by having one of our advanced midfielders make a deep movement. Dropping back provides them with more time and space, creating a 4 vs 3 situation. The rest of the team must adjust accordingly. For instance, the winger could shift to occupy the central space, while the fullback moves higher up the flank.

Conclusion

The 4-3-3 formation is a flexible system that allows for rational space occupation and numerous passing options for the ball holder. However, it is crucial to understand how to modify this system when facing different formations to maximize team performance. Against a 3-5-2 formation, it’s important to identify which player is leading the pressing and adapt our movements to attack the space behind. Conversely, when facing a 4-2-3-1, we can leverage the numerical superiority in the first line by driving the ball with one of our center-backs and playing either inside the opposing block or diagonally to an advanced midfielder or winger on the opposite flank. Each game situation requires a specific approach, and as coaches, we need to understand how to maximize the strengths of our system based on the opponent’s formation.

Do you want to learn more about different soccer formations and master the concept of ‘system vs system’?
Join our membership plans at the Ekkono Coaches Academy and elevate your coaching expertise.